From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Tricaud Subject: Re: [libipq] owner of packet, possible patch Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:22 +0100 Message-ID: <45EED03E.8000006@wengo.com> References: <619420780703060739k18ec820dnc8f681b8fc517825@mail.gmail.com> <1173196307.23222.17.camel@localhost> <5e70f6530703061017h655c8861q3b2cf4a0e92dee05@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5e70f6530703061017h655c8861q3b2cf4a0e92dee05@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: TheGesus Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, Eric Leblond TheGesus wrote: > On 3/6/07, Eric Leblond wrote: > >> ipqueue is deprecated in favor of libnetfilter_queue ... > > Oddly, our friends over at SourceFire are still using libipq for snort > inline for some unknown reason. > You should drop them a note on this subject and let them know the > error of their ways. I'm sure they'd appreciate it. This is a total lack of knowledge from your side. Please go to the following URL : http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/snort-inline/snort_inline-2.6.1.2-BETA1.tar.gz?download Extract source code and grep for libnetfilter_queue inside. You will find they are using it. > > While you're at it maybe you can convince them to stop linking against > that ancient version of libnet they're so fond of. > There might be a reason you are not aware of. Why don't you ask them ? Love, Sebastien. ---- Envie d'etre gentil ? Insultron v.2! http://www.nospoon.org/misc/insultron2.html