From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45EFF835.9010305@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:49:09 +0100 From: Steven Scholz MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] xenomai preempting interrupt handler ? References: <45EFD796.7050002@domain.hid> <1173346938.17515.16.camel@domain.hid> <45EFE089.9000508@domain.hid> <1173349157.17515.19.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1173349157.17515.19.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: rpm@xenomai.org Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid Philippe, >>>> Thus will the duration of the >>>> ethernet interrupt handler add the the worst case latency? >>> Not from Linux IRQ handlers; you may want to check this using the >>> tracer. If hw interrupts are masked there, then it's a blatant bug. >> How could I check this using the tracer? Small hint please? > > http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/I-pipe:Tracer "Traces can be generated in many ways. One happens automatically when CONFIG_IPIPE_TRACE_IRQSOFF is enabled." What exactly does that mean? That one trace is generated during boot? "Another way is to invoke the testsuite, namely latency or irqbench with the option -f to trigger a freeze on each new maximum latency." What exactly does "trigger a freeze" mean? Steven