From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: AK <amithl_prem@yahoo.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Performance: NFS v3 mounting with 'noac' option
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:13:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F03624.1000207@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <121929.1837.qm@web56610.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
AK wrote:
> --- Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> What about this application requires that the
>>>>
>> "noac"
>>
>>>> option be used?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> application is romio with mpich2 ...
>>>
>> Sorry, I'm not familiar with those. What about
>> either one of those
>> require "noac" semantics?
>>
>
> "To use ROMIO on NFS, file locking with fcntl must
> work correctly on the NFS installation. On some
> installations, fcntl locks don't work. To get them to
> work, you need to use Version 3 of NFS, ensure that
> the lockd daemon is running on all the machines, and
> have the system administrator mount the NFS file
> system with the "noac" option (no attribute caching).
> Turning off attribute caching may reduce performance,
> but it is necessary for correct behavior."
I think that I would assume that fcntl style locking works on all current
implementations, that this is not NFS version dependent, and also that
"noac" is not required in combination with the locking in order to get
correct behavior.
ps
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-07 14:54 Performance: NFS v3 mounting with 'noac' option AK
2007-03-07 17:55 ` Peter Staubach
2007-03-07 21:32 ` AK
2007-03-07 22:39 ` Peter Staubach
2007-03-08 14:55 ` AK
2007-03-08 16:13 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2007-03-08 16:19 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-08 16:52 ` AK
2007-03-08 17:06 ` Talpey, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F03624.1000207@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=amithl_prem@yahoo.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.