From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993017AbXCIGpO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:45:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993016AbXCIGpN (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:45:13 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:29879 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993014AbXCIGpL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:45:11 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,265,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="192939735:sNHT17507273" Message-ID: <45F10274.7070500@intel.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:45:08 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christopher.leech@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Multiple queue network device support REPOST References: <1173420779298-git-send-email-peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> <20070308.222154.74746753.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20070308.222154.74746753.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > You didn't address my correction the other day wherein I clarified > for you that my idea was not to store the queue mapping in > skb->priority but rather to shrink skb->priority to a u16 and > add a new u16 skb->queue_mapping or whatever field to store the > necessary information. > > You're just posting a set of patches using the same approach again > plus some bug fixes, so there is essentially nothing new for anyone to > review. > > Why ask for feedback if you fail to take any of it into consideration? > :-/ Where are the patches anyway? They didn't seem to make it either to netdev nor lkml! Auke