From: j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl (Hans de Goede)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] libsensors patches
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:54:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F4181A.8080101@hhs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070311152104.bd092ff9.khali@linux-fr.org>
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Hans,
<stuff about me prefering small increments in 2.10 instead of doing 3.0
snipped>
> I don't really care, libsensors is more or less Mark's realm, I am busy
> enough with the kernel side of things. As long as we do not duplicate
> the effort in two different branches, I'm fine. Also keep in mind that
> the 2.10.x branch _must_ be stable. We must be able to release a new
> version any time if there's a need, as is the case for 2.10.3. Going
> with a 3.0.x branch makes it possible to make things unstable if it's
> easier that way.
The patches I'm talking about where specificly designed to:
1) Keep backwards compatibility
2) Not change any behaviour for chips already supported. Actually for
chips already supported the whole code path they introduce is never
entered.
This minimizing the chance of introducing instability. Also keep in mind
that a 3.0 branch will not be thoroughly tested by a wide audience until
released , so that won't help much either.
Anyways lets wait and see what Mark has to say, I've made my preferences
clear and I will follow whatever Mark decides.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-11 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 14:21 [lm-sensors] libsensors patches Jean Delvare
2007-03-11 14:54 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2007-03-11 15:55 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-03-11 17:13 ` Hans de Goede
2007-03-11 17:44 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-03-11 18:28 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-03-11 19:20 ` Axel Thimm
2007-03-11 19:23 ` Hans de Goede
2007-03-11 19:28 ` Axel Thimm
2007-03-11 19:53 ` Hans de Goede
2007-03-11 20:28 ` Axel Thimm
2007-03-11 20:54 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-03-11 21:47 ` Hans de Goede
2007-03-12 9:38 ` Jean Delvare
2007-03-12 10:12 ` Jean Delvare
2007-03-12 11:21 ` Axel Thimm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F4181A.8080101@hhs.nl \
--to=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.