From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack question
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:14:10 +0100
Message-ID: <45F527F2.40404@netfilter.org>
References: <45F4B34F.3020007@ipom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
To: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <45F4B34F.3020007@ipom.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> For what it's worth, I'm using libnetfilter_conntrack 0.0.31 on a 2.6.15.6
> kernel (yes, I know, it's a bit old). /proc/net/ip_conntrack shows more
> expected data - source and destinations being different.

That release is from the Stone age, we've got one more recent, and
you're using the old API, please upgrade. I would also suggest you to
upgrade your kernel, at least to 2.6.18.

-- 
The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of
great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris