All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
To: xenomai-help <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: [Xenomai-help] Latencies due to RT-Socket-CAN register accesses
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:52:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F68258.5040603@domain.hid> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 831 bytes --]

Hallo,

in the meantime I have measured the latencies introduced through 
messages sent and received by RT-Socket-CAN. The SJA1000 register access 
times on my rather old PC with an Athlon 1100 Mhz are:

PEAK-Dongle: read  access: 11807 ns
PEAK-Dongle: write access: 11677 ns

IXXAT-PCI  : read  access:   729 ns
IXXAT-PCI  : write access:   305 ns

I measured an increase of the latency of approx. 170us with the 
PEAK-Dongle and approx 13us with the IXXAT-PCI card for the reception of 
a full CAN message (with 8 bytes payload). Sending messages is a bit 
less disturbing. I have attached a small patch to measure the SJA1000 
register access times when the driver is initialized. You are welcome to 
apply it on your setup and report the results. I'm especially interested 
in numbers for the ISA bus (or PC-104).

Wolfgang.



[-- Attachment #2: xenomai-rtcan-iotest.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1278 bytes --]

+ diff -u xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_dev.c.IOTEST xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_dev.c
+ diff -u xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c.IOTEST xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c
--- xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c.IOTEST	2007-02-26 09:17:27.000000000 +0100
+++ xenomai/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c	2007-03-13 10:01:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -728,6 +728,30 @@
     if (chip == NULL)
 	return -EINVAL;
 
+#if 1
+    {
+	nanosecs_abs_t begin, diff;
+	volatile u8 reg;
+	int i, count = 100000;
+	begin = rtdm_clock_read();
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+	    reg = chip->read_reg(dev, 0);
+	}
+	diff = rtdm_clock_read() - begin;
+	printk("%s: register read time for %d accessed: %ld (%ld per access)\n",
+	       dev->board_name, count,
+	       (unsigned long)diff, (unsigned long)diff / count);
+	begin = rtdm_clock_read();
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		chip->write_reg(dev, 0, reg);
+	}
+	diff = rtdm_clock_read() - begin;
+	printk("%s: register write time for %d accessed: %ld (%ld per access)\n",
+	       dev->board_name, count,
+	       (unsigned long)diff, (unsigned long)diff / count);
+    }
+#endif
+
     /* Set dummy state for following call */
     dev->state = CAN_STATE_ACTIVE;
     /* Enter reset mode */

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-13 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13 10:52 Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2007-03-13 13:16 ` [Xenomai-help] Re: Latencies due to RT-Socket-CAN register accesses Roland Tollenaar
2007-03-13 13:29   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-03-13 13:41     ` Roland Tollenaar
2007-03-13 14:06       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-03-14  9:33       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-03-28 17:05       ` roland Tollenaar
2007-03-28 18:50         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-03-29  2:17           ` Roland Tollenaar
2007-03-29  8:38             ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2007-03-29  8:59             ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-03-29 16:44               ` Roland Tollenaar
2007-03-29 18:51                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-03-29 18:59                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-04-23 15:09                   ` [Xenomai-help] " roland Tollenaar
2007-04-23 18:28                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-24  8:44                       ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24  8:56                         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-24 10:27                           ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 10:27                             ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 12:57                               ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-24 18:36                                 ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24  9:05                         ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-24 10:31                           ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 10:51                             ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-24 12:14                               ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 12:32                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-24 10:57                             ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-04-24 11:00                               ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-24 12:17                               ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 12:19                                 ` roland Tollenaar
2007-04-24 12:44                                   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-04-25  9:04                     ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2007-04-25 11:02                       ` Roland Tollenaar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F68258.5040603@domain.hid \
    --to=wg@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.