From: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
To: Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@hp.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SWS for rcvbuf < MTU
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:01:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F6F51E.6090905@psc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703051152.27780.alexandre.sidorenko@hp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2349 bytes --]
Alex Sidorenko wrote:
> Here are the values from live kernel (obtained with 'crash') when the host was
> in SWS state:
>
> full_space=708 full_space/2=354
> free_space=393
> window=76
>
> In this case the test from my original fix, (window < full_space/2),
> succeeds. But John's test
>
> free_space > window + full_space/2
> 393 430
>
> does not. So I suspect that the new fix will not always work. From tcpdump
> traces we can see that both hosts exchange with 76-byte packets for a long
> time. From customer's application log we see that it continues to read
> 76-byte chunks per each read() call - even though more than that is available
> in the receive buffer. Technically it's OK for read() to return even after
> reading one byte, so if sk->receive_queue contains multiple 76-byte skbuffs
> we may return after processing just one skbuff (but we we don't understand
> the details of why this happens on customer's system).
>
> Are there any particular reasons why you want to postpone window update until
> free_space becomes > window + full_space/2 and not as soon as
> free_space > full_space/2? As the only real-life occurance of SWS shows
> free_space oscillating slightly above full_space/2, I created the fix
> specifically to match this phenomena as seen on customer's host. We reach the
> modified section only when (free_space > full_space/2) so it should be OK to
> update the window at this point if mss==full_space.
>
> So yes, we can test John's fix on customer's host but I doubt it will work for
> the reasons mentioned above, in brief:
>
> 'window = free_space' instead of 'window=full_space/2' is OK,
> but the test 'free_space > window + full_space/2' is not for the specific
> pattern customer sees on his hosts.
Sorry for the long delay in response, I've been on vacation. I'm okay
with your patch, and I can't think of any real problem with it, except
that the behavior is non-standard. Then again, Linux acking in general
is non-standard, which has created the bug in the first place. :) The
only thing I can think where it might still ack too often is if
free_space frequently drops just below full_space/2 for a bit then rises
above full_space/2.
I've also attached a corrected version of my earlier patch that I think
solves the problem you noted.
Thanks,
-John
[-- Attachment #2: rcv-sws.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]
Do full receiver-side SWS avoidance when rcvbuf < mss.
Signed-off-by: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
---
commit f4333661026621e15549fb75b37be785e4a1c443
tree 30d46b64ea19634875fdd4656d33f76db526a313
parent 562aa1d4c6a874373f9a48ac184f662fbbb06a04
author John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu> Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:03 -0400
committer John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu> Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:03 -0400
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index dc15113..e621a63 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1605,8 +1605,15 @@ u32 __tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk)
* We also don't do any window rounding when the free space
* is too small.
*/
- if (window <= free_space - mss || window > free_space)
+ if (window <= free_space - mss || window > free_space) {
window = (free_space/mss)*mss;
+ } else if (mss == full_space) {
+ /* Do full receive-side SWS avoidance
+ * when rcvbuf <= mss */
+ window = tcp_receive_window(tp);
+ if (free_space > window + full_space/2)
+ window = free_space;
+ }
}
return window;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-13 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-02 16:28 SWS for rcvbuf < MTU Alex Sidorenko
2007-03-02 18:54 ` John Heffner
2007-03-02 20:29 ` Alex Sidorenko
2007-03-02 19:25 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 20:21 ` Alex Sidorenko
2007-03-02 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 21:16 ` John Heffner
2007-03-02 21:38 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 23:40 ` John Heffner
2007-03-05 16:52 ` Alex Sidorenko
2007-03-13 19:01 ` John Heffner [this message]
2007-03-14 16:18 ` Alex Sidorenko
2007-04-02 20:01 ` Alex Sidorenko
2007-04-02 20:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F6F51E.6090905@psc.edu \
--to=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=alexandre.sidorenko@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.