All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:30:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F7A4B3.5040005@sw.ru> (raw)

Hi.

I'm looking at how alloc_pid() works and can't understand
one (simple/stupid) thing.

It first kmem_cache_alloc()-s a strct pid, then calls
alloc_pidmap() and at the end it taks a global pidmap_lock()
to add new pid to hash.

The question is - why does alloc_pidmap() use at least
two atomic ops and potentially loop to find a zero bit
in pidmap? Why not call alloc_pidmap() under pidmap_lock
and find zero pid in pidmap w/o any loops and atomics?

The same is for free_pid(). Do I miss something?

Thank,
Pavel

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-14  7:30 Pavel Emelianov [this message]
2007-03-14 14:12 ` [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-14 15:03   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-14 16:54     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-15 20:26       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-16 13:04         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 19:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-16 21:18             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-14 15:33   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-16 10:57     ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-03-16 11:37       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-16 11:58         ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-03-16 11:40       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-03-14 14:43 ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F7A4B3.5040005@sw.ru \
    --to=xemul@sw.ru \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.