From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: return value checking on multicalls
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:55:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F828EB.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
Many places currently don't even check HYPERVISOR_multicall()'s return
value, not to speak of checking the individual status codes. Would it be
acceptable to add an argument to this function to request to either fold
all status values into a global success code, or to force BUG_ON() each
individual status. Or should I rather add a new function with described
behavior? Or are there other suggestions?
Thanks, Jan
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-14 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-14 15:55 Jan Beulich [this message]
2007-03-14 16:00 ` return value checking on multicalls Keir Fraser
2007-03-14 16:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 16:58 ` Jan Beulich
2007-03-14 17:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F828EB.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.