From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, mpm@selenic.com, bcrl@kvack.org
Subject: Re: cleaner/better zlib sources?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:11:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F9EED5.3070706@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703151747110.3816@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, it's possible that I'm just wrong, but the instruction-level profile
> really did pinpoint the "look up state branch pointer and jump to it" as
> some of the hottest part of that function. Which is just *evil*. You can
ISTR there are a bunch of state transitions per byte, which would make
sense that it shows up on profiles.
> Now, I'm just wondering if anybody knows if there are better zlib
> implementations out there? This really looks like it could be a noticeable
> performance issue, but I'm lazy and would be much happier to hear that
> somebody has already played with optimizing zlib. Especially since I'm not
> 100% sure it's really going to be noticeable..
I could have sworn that either Matt Mackall or Ben LaHaise had cleaned
up the existing zlib so much that it was practically a new
implementation. I'm not aware of any open source implementations
independent of zlib (except maybe that C++ behemoth, 7zip).
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-16 1:04 cleaner/better zlib sources? Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 1:10 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-16 1:11 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-03-16 1:14 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-16 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 1:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 2:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-16 2:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 3:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-16 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 16:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-16 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 19:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-17 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 3:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-17 5:19 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-17 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 19:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make trivial wrapper functions around delta base generation and freeing Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-17 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 1:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-18 7:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-17 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-17 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-17 23:52 ` Jon Smirl
2007-03-18 1:14 ` Morten Welinder
2007-03-18 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 1:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-18 1:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 2:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-18 2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 3:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-18 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 5:30 ` Julian Phillips
2007-03-18 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 10:53 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-03-18 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 18:29 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-03-18 21:25 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-19 13:16 ` David Brodsky
2007-03-20 6:35 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-03-20 9:13 ` David Brodsky
2007-03-21 2:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-21 2:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-18 3:06 ` [PATCH 3/2] Avoid unnecessary strlen() calls Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 9:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-18 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 15:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 21:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-18 21:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 3:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-20 3:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-20 3:40 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-20 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 4:18 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-20 4:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 5:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-20 3:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-20 4:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 4:39 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-20 4:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 1:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 6:28 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-17 22:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 16:35 ` cleaner/better zlib sources? Jeff Garzik
2007-03-16 16:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-16 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 17:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-16 23:22 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-16 17:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-16 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 18:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-03-16 1:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-16 2:06 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-16 6:08 linux
2007-03-16 11:34 ` Florian Weimer
2007-03-16 15:51 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2007-03-16 16:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-16 17:39 ` linux
2007-03-16 22:45 ` Josef Weidendorfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F9EED5.3070706@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.