From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:05:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from father.pmc-sierra.com ([216.241.224.13]:36859 "HELO father.pmc-sierra.bc.ca") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S20022633AbXCQAFU (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:05:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 14721 invoked by uid 101); 17 Mar 2007 00:04:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca) (216.241.226.184) by father.pmc-sierra.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2007 00:04:13 -0000 Received: from bby1exi01.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca [216.241.231.251]) by pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (8.13.4/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l2H04CPX005540; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:04:12 -0800 Received: by bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:04:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45FB3076.4080403@pmc-sierra.com> From: Marc St-Jean To: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] mips: PMC MSP71xx core platform Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:04:06 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) x-originalarrivaltime: 17 Mar 2007 01:03:59.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[25732310:01C76830] user-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14513 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:32:56PM -0600, Marc St-Jean wrote: > > > [PATCH 1/12] mips: PMC MSP71xx core platform > > > > Patch to add core platform support for the PMC-Sierra > > MSP71xx devices. > > When I first reviewed this patch I requested removal of prom_printf and > all stuff like prom_getchar, prom_putchar that was associated with it > because I was about to remove prom_printf. Well, prom_printf is gone > now which means this patch will no longer work ... > > Ralf > I read your original comment as this option being the least desirable of the two options you presented, but still available. I will rewrite it using the other option and resubmit this patch. Thanks for the heads up, Marc