From: Chris Madden <chris@reflexsecurity.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, tgraf@suug.ch, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Oops in filter add
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:10:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FEEE35.6090606@reflexsecurity.com> (raw)
Hi-
We're experiencing an oops when we attempt to add a filter to an ingress
qdisc while heavy traffic is passing through the device being
manipulated. Currently, we're using 2.6.20.3. Here is the setup:
We have traffic coming in a device, say, eth1. While traffic comes in,
we use tc to add an ingress queuing discipline with "tc qdisc add dev
eth1 handle ffff: ingress". This works, and a "tc qdisc show" confirms
that it is in place.
Its hard to boil down exactly where things are going wrong, but it seems
to center around adding a basic match filter to the ingress path we
created above.
I did some digging, and it appears the filter add isn't mutexed right.
Inside net/core/dev.c, ing_filter, I see:
spin_lock(&dev->ingress_lock);
if ((q = dev->qdisc_ingress) != NULL)
result = q->enqueue(skb, q);
spin_unlock(&dev->ingress_lock);
And unless I'm missing something, this is the only place this lock is
used ( other than initialization ). In net/sched/cls_api.c, I see we do
qdisc_lock_tree/qdisc_unlock_tree (which locks dev->queue_lock). As
near as I can tell, this is our problem ( our mutexes don't prohibit
manipulation while packets are flowing ).
It doesn't happen every time, but if we have a script that adds/removes
qdiscs and filters, and run a few hundred megabit through the interface,
it dies eventually. I've been trying to puzzle out the locking myself,
but I fear I've been less than successful.
Oops below:
[<c0220681>] tc_classify+0x34/0xbc
[<f8a4d10b>] ingress_enqueue+0x16/0x55 [sch_ingress]
[<c021451e>] netif_receive_skb+0x1de/0x2bf
[<f88a6169>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x35b/0x42c [e1000]
[<f88a5e0e>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x0/0x42c [e1000]
[<f88a519b>] e1000_clean+0x6e/0x23d [e1000]
[<c0215ed7>] net_rx_action+0xd5/0x1c6
[<c011cafc>] __do_softirq+0x5d/0xba
[<c0104c7f>] do_softirq+0x59/0xa9
[<f8a50194>] basic_dump+0x0/0x115 [cls_basic]
[<c022458e>] tcf_em_tree_dump+0x14d/0x2ff
[<c01341db>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xa0
[<c0104d70>] do_IRQ+0xa1/0xb9
[<c010367f>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
[<f8a50497>] basic_change+0x167/0x370 [cls_basic]
[<c02220df>] tc_ctl_tfilter+0x3ec/0x469
[<c0221cf3>] tc_ctl_tfilter+0x0/0x469
[<c021b250>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1b3/0x1d8
[<c0221378>] tc_dump_qdisc+0x0/0xfe
[<c02259cd>] netlink_run_queue+0x50/0xbe
[<c021b09d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x1d8
[<c021b05c>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x3d
[<c0225e14>] netlink_data_ready+0x12/0x4c
[<c0224e0e>] netlink_sendskb+0x19/0x30
[<c0225df6>] netlink_sendmsg+0x242/0x24e
[<c020ba1f>] sock_sendmsg+0xbc/0xd4
[<c0128325>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
[<c0128325>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
[<c021180e>] verify_iovec+0x3e/0x70
[<c020bbcb>] sys_sendmsg+0x194/0x1f9
[<c0112bde>] __wake_up+0x32/0x43
[<c022506a>] netlink_insert+0x106/0x110
[<c022513b>] netlink_autobind+0xc7/0xe3
[<c0226356>] netlink_bind+0x8d/0x127
[<c013f61b>] do_wp_page+0x149/0x36c
[<c015d17b>] d_alloc+0x138/0x17a
[<c0140a24>] __handle_mm_fault+0x756/0x7a6
[<c020ca68>] sys_socketcall+0x223/0x242
[<c0263d8b>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x525
[<c0102ce4>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Chris Madden
Reflex Security
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-19 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-19 20:10 Chris Madden [this message]
2007-03-20 2:22 ` Oops in filter add David Miller
2007-03-20 6:54 ` jamal
2007-03-20 6:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 7:18 ` jamal
2007-03-20 7:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 9:25 ` jamal
2007-03-20 10:54 ` Chris Madden
2007-03-20 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 10:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-21 9:33 ` jamal
2007-03-20 14:15 ` Chris Madden
2007-03-20 14:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 14:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 15:11 ` Thomas Graf
2007-03-20 15:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 16:27 ` Chris Madden
2007-03-20 17:06 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45FEEE35.6090606@reflexsecurity.com \
--to=chris@reflexsecurity.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.