From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Sebastien Tandel <standel@info.ucl.ac.be>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: bloom filter in netfilter?
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:25:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FFFCE5.6030705@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45FFF8C3.9050606@info.ucl.ac.be>
Hi Sebastien,
Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> I'm wondering if bloom filters could not improve performance of the
> conntracker. For a quick overwiew of bloom filters see
> http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~michaelm/NEWWORK/postscripts/BloomFilterSurvey.pdf
Yes, I know that work.
> In a few words, a bloom filter is a data structure which represents
> concisely a set. When you have a set, you can decide very quickly if an
> element belongs to it.
>
> I was then wondering if we could not get rid of these two
> list_for_each_entry in the __nf_conntrack_confirm by using the bloom
> filters.
We can't just get rid of it since bloom filters have false positives, so
it could happen that we could miss some new connections that are not
actually in the conntrack table.
--
The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of
great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-20 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-20 15:07 bloom filter in netfilter? Sebastien Tandel
2007-03-20 15:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 15:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2007-03-20 15:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-20 15:34 ` Patrick Schaaf
2007-03-20 15:43 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-20 16:31 Robert Iakobashvili
2007-03-20 16:37 [Fwd: Re: bloom filter in netfilter?] Sebastien Tandel
2007-03-20 19:27 ` bloom filter in netfilter? Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-03-20 21:41 ` Sebastien Tandel
2007-03-21 12:45 ` Sebastien Tandel
2007-03-21 12:46 ` Sebastien Tandel
2007-03-21 15:00 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45FFFCE5.6030705@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=standel@info.ucl.ac.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.