From: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: bakabaka9 <baka9@bakabaka9.tech>,
jikos@kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org, bentiss@kernel.org
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] HID: sensor-hub: Fix out-of-bounds write in sensor_hub_get_feature
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:24:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45d002c27ec333bec9bc83b7d164444d6a0b510c.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805185753.3069-1-baka9@bakabaka9.tech>
On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 18:57 +0000, bakabaka9 wrote:
> From: Xingrui Li <baka9@bakabaka9.tech>
>
> sensor_hub_get_feature() clamps its return value to the caller's
> buffer
> size, but the copy loop still copies field->report_size / 8 bytes for
> each report value. A malicious HID descriptor can advertise a large
> feature field size while an IIO caller supplies a small stack buffer,
> such as a single s32, causing an out-of-bounds write.
>
> HID core stores parsed report values in __s32 slots and clamps
> extracted
> values to 32 bits. Reject feature fields that require more than one
> slot
> per value, guard the total byte count calculation, and clamp each
> per-value copy to the remaining caller buffer.
>
> Fixes: 5459ada2b3cd69 ("HID: sensor-hub: Fix packing of result buffer
> for feature report")
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.5-Cyber
> Signed-off-by: Xingrui Li <baka9@bakabaka9.tech>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> --
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-
> hub.c
> index 34f710c465b8..6470a290ebfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -239,12 +239,17 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct
> hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
> u32 field_index, int buffer_size, void
> *buffer)
> {
> struct hid_report *report;
> + struct hid_field *field;
> struct sensor_hub_data *data = hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
> - int report_size;
> + size_t field_size;
> + size_t report_size;
> + size_t copied = 0;
> + size_t to_copy;
> int ret = 0;
> - u8 *val_ptr;
> - int buffer_index = 0;
> - int i;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!buffer || buffer_size <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> memset(buffer, 0, buffer_size);
>
> @@ -258,26 +263,29 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct
> hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
> hid_hw_request(hsdev->hdev, report, HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
> hid_hw_wait(hsdev->hdev);
>
> + field = report->field[field_index];
> +
> /* calculate number of bytes required to read this field */
> - report_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(report->field[field_index]-
> >report_size,
> - 8) *
> - report->field[field_index]-
> >report_count;
> - if (!report_size) {
> + field_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(field->report_size, 8);
> + /* HID core stores each parsed report value in a __s32 slot.
> */
> + if (!field_size || field_size > sizeof(field->value[0])) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto done_proc;
> + }
> + if (field->report_count > SIZE_MAX / field_size) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto done_proc;
> }
> - ret = min(report_size, buffer_size);
>
> - val_ptr = (u8 *)report->field[field_index]->value;
> - for (i = 0; i < report->field[field_index]->report_count;
> ++i) {
> - if (buffer_index >= ret)
> - break;
> + report_size = field_size * field->report_count;
> + report_size = min_t(size_t, report_size, buffer_size);
>
> - memcpy(&((u8 *)buffer)[buffer_index], val_ptr,
> - report->field[field_index]->report_size / 8);
> - val_ptr += sizeof(__s32);
> - buffer_index += (report->field[field_index]-
> >report_size / 8);
> + for (i = 0; i < field->report_count && copied < report_size;
> ++i) {
> + to_copy = min(field_size, report_size - copied);
> + memcpy(&((u8 *)buffer)[copied], &field->value[i],
> to_copy);
> + copied += to_copy;
> }
> + ret = copied;
>
> done_proc:
> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 18:57 [PATCH v2 RESEND] HID: sensor-hub: Fix out-of-bounds write in sensor_hub_get_feature bakabaka9
2026-08-05 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 22:24 ` srinivas pandruvada [this message]
2026-08-14 12:56 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45d002c27ec333bec9bc83b7d164444d6a0b510c.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baka9@bakabaka9.tech \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.