From: Zacco <zacco@fw.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: baruch@ev-en.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: many sockets, slow sendto
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:59:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4600592E.80605@fw.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070319.161611.70218081.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Zacco <zacco@fw.hu>
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:10:19 +0100
>
>
>> As you recommended, I used oprofile and it turned out that the
>> __udp4_lib_lookup function spent most of the time. There is a udp hash
>> table and the sockets are sought based on the 7 LSBs of the destination
>> port number. So what happened is now quite obvious: I had many thousands
>> of sockets, all with the same destination port, thus linked in the same
>> slot of this hash table. I tried using different ports and it
>> was much faster then.
>>
>
> There isn't much we can do here. I bet your destination address
> is unchanging just like your destination ports.
>
As I'm simulating independent users on one host, each user has a
different IP address, but each with the same port. So unlike the port,
the address is changing, basically it's a huge A-class range.
> UDP apps can and do bind to specific destination addresses and
> ports, but the source side is usually wild-carded.
>
Right, usually it is, but in my case the source addresses are also
bound, otherwise the source address would be the primary address of the
physical interface; however, I need to simulate users as if they were on
separate hosts.
> Are both the source address and port fully specified for your
> sockets? Maybe we can do something using if that's the case...
>
You made me curious. :) What do you have in mind?
thx: Zacco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-20 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-06 15:08 many sockets, slow sendto Zaccomer Lajos
2007-03-06 18:20 ` Baruch Even
2007-03-19 23:10 ` Zacco
2007-03-19 23:16 ` David Miller
2007-03-20 21:59 ` Zacco [this message]
2007-03-20 22:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 21:53 ` Zacco
2007-03-21 22:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 23:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-22 1:14 ` David Miller
2007-03-21 22:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-22 1:15 ` David Miller
2007-03-22 6:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-29 19:24 ` Zacco
2007-03-30 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-22 12:34 ` Zacco
2007-04-30 7:26 ` David Miller
2007-04-30 10:56 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-04-30 12:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-30 19:43 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-04-30 19:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 19:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 21:28 ` Zacco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4600592E.80605@fw.hu \
--to=zacco@fw.hu \
--cc=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.