From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Ka6xR-0007Q8-JN for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:48:29 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ka6xP-0007N8-5E for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:48:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ka6xO-0007MK-CW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:48:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50989 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ka6xO-0007M4-64 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:48:26 -0400 Received: from web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.147]:32544) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ka6xN-0002rk-IM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:48:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 304 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Sep 2008 10:48:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=hrcn70W97TumLVcgWkIs4CE3pjLOKfwuEMh71SXZDqy47RJgexqbVylmaUf84UKW/VdX+MrunM6AEuB45o66h4ZBGSr8tLEJhKh8qLnnRBieBeRwqXgkGqudbykUtYBCJAve/Z3OaG2JO4vavnKnBPsO1BcSWd7N34GGYPeCyTI=; X-YMail-OSG: KIbcxcMVM1nBP0qlSdg6kcuuS9kXWY9QHTzv3FXYVxrLzIP52csHT888P_JJaecQv_dUm9cBbe3fFZRAqV_Wd7njBgqC0N6p2YfOYkFuKZR2vS37V3_u76ARoNYRZWKQilYwrmqUWqME6cdW4m3RwTk- Received: from [202.62.94.130] by web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:48:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1096.28 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 03:48:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Viswesh S To: The development of GRUB 2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1066878000-1220266104=:273" Message-ID: <460235.273.qm@web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) Subject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:48:27 -0000 --0-1066878000-1220266104=:273 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Bean = =0ATo: The development of GRUB 2 =0ASent: Monday, 1 Sep= tember, 2008 3:46:32 PM=0ASubject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2=0A=0AOn Mon, = Sep 1, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Viswesh S wrote:=0A>=0A>= =0A=0AHi,=0A=0ADo you mean the result is still the same after you apply my = patch ? I=0Acheck the source code of grub legacy, the handling should be ex= actly=0Athe same. Are you using the official branch grub 0.96, or some pack= age=0Awith modification ?=0A=0AYou can also check memory at 0x7be, this sho= uld be the partition table=0Ain mbr, %esi would point to the boot partition= .=0A=0A-- =0ABean=0A=0AHi,=0A=0AThe result is still the same after the patc= h.=0A=0AI am using the official grub2 released package 1.96.=0A=0AIn that t= he chainloader patch wasnt there.Hence applied that according to your input= s as in the mail.=0A=0AI checked the memory at 0x7be, which is the same as = 0x1be in the mbr.=0A=0AThe first partition was already active also.=0A=0AAl= so as I mentioned,what about the code for the int 13 extension and and thei= r functionalities for 2,41,42.=0A=0AIs there any change there.=0A=0AOtherwi= se I am not really sure, why grub is able to boot,but grub2 not.=0A=0AViswe= sh=0A_______________________________________________=0AGrub-devel mailing l= ist=0AGrub-devel@gnu.org=0Ahttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel= =0A=0A=0A=0A Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http= ://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ --0-1066878000-1220266104=:273 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0A

=0A
----- Original Message ----
From: Bean <b= ean123ch@gmail.com>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.= org>
Sent: Monday, 1 September, 2008 3:46:32 PM
Subject: Re: Windo= ws,grub and grub2

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Viswesh S <viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>

Hi,
Do you mean the result is still the same after you apply my patch ? I<= BR>check the source code of grub legacy, the handling should be exactly
= the same. Are you using the official branch grub 0.96, or some package
w= ith modification ?

You can also check memory at 0x7be, this should b= e the partition table
in mbr, %esi would point to the boot partition.
--
Bean
=0A
 
=0A
Hi,
=0A
 
=0A
The result = is still the same after the patch.
=0A
 
=0A
I am using the offi= cial grub2 released package 1.96.
=0A
 
=0A
In that the chainloa= der patch wasnt there.Hence applied that according to your inputs as in the= mail.
=0A
 
=0A
I checked the memory at 0x7be, which is the sam= e as 0x1be in the mbr.
=0A
 
=0A
The first partition was already= active also.

Also as I mentioned,what about the code for the int 13= extension and and their functionalities for 2,41,42.
=0A
 
= =0A
 
=0A
Otherwise I am not really= sure, why grub is able to boot,but grub2 not.
=0A
 
=0A
Viswesh=
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing l= ist
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/g= rub-devel

=0A=0A=0A=0A
Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now --0-1066878000-1220266104=:273--