From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tgh Subject: Re: Re: NUMA and SMP Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:47:44 +0800 Message-ID: <46036A00.3040600@ncic.ac.cn> References: <4601D8DE.1070602@ncic.ac.cn> <1174560170.28163.67.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <460272F7.8030407@ncic.ac.cn> <1174566510.30554.8.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <20070322130238.GS17518@us.ibm.com> <1174575365.2961.10.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <20070322151218.GW17518@us.ibm.com> <1174577909.4957.4.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <20070322160158.GY17518@us.ibm.com> <1174580527.4957.9.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <20070322170238.GA17518@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070322170238.GA17518@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ryan Harper Cc: Xen Developers , Daniel Stodden List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org hi how many nodes in the numa with adm64 does xen support at present? Thank you Ryan Harper =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > * Daniel Stodden [2007-03-22 11:25]: > =20 >> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:01 -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: >> >> =20 >>>> i see. not like i'm too deep in the srat, but methinks there may be = sane >>>> default values to be generated from the srat. any work happening or >>>> having happened on that front? >>>> =20 >>> Xen understands the topology but does not make any direct use of the >>> information in either the initial placement of VCPUs for the guest, n= or >>> in the scheduler when making migration decisions. I'm not aware of a= ny >>> work to address that at the moment. >>> =20 >> thanks. do you continue work on xen and numa, or proceed elsewhere? >> =20 > > I continue to work on xen and keep and eye on the NUMA support. > > =20