From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4607E9AC.80408@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:41:32 -0400 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Moore CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Refpolicy: allow netlabelctl to be run at boot References: <20070309203327.709750017@hp.com> <20070309203513.357373998@hp.com> <1174922303.28830.24.camel@sgc> <200703261129.51045.paul.moore@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200703261129.51045.paul.moore@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Paul Moore wrote: > On Monday, March 26 2007 11:18:23 am Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > >> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:33 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: >> >>> Allow the NetLabel management tools to be run at boot from the init >>> scripts. >>> >> Is this actually a daemon or just a regular application? If its not a >> daemon it should be using init_system_domain() instead. >> > > Check our email from last Friday (3/23). It's okay, it's Monday morning ;) > > I agree, knowing what I know now it should be init_system_domain(), there is > probably another change needed as this patch seemed to introduce a bug (or > flush out an old one) which Dan fixed in selinux-policy-2.4.6-47 for RHEL5. > Unfortunately, I can't get at the RPM right now (got a pointer Dan?) so I > can't do a diff and see what changed ... > > It is probably best to hold on this for now, sorry for the confusion, but I > was hoping to have the fix for this by now. > > RHEL5 and Rawhide policy are identical. I have no problem changing to init_system_domain. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.