From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115]:47850 "EHLO mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030580AbXC2R5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:57:13 -0400 Message-ID: <460BFDF0.9010401@lwfinger.net> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:57:04 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Change initialization for 2050 radios References: <460a92d5.+NfCgWddLCeb9ty2%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <1175188955.3122.42.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1175188955.3122.42.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >> This patch implements the changes in the specifications for >> 2050radio_init that were recently posted. > > That seems to help performance quite a lot -- although 'rate 11M' still > runs a _lot_ faster than the 24M which the driver seems to settle at by > default, when it's sitting 1m from the AP. > Is the better performance for 11M in transmitting or receiving? How is it measured? My 4306's, which should be the same as yours, do better at 24M than at 11M. Larry