From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nivedita Singhvi Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] Autotool support for IBM RT Cases Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:08:18 -0700 Message-ID: <460C1CB2.80707@us.ibm.com> References: <20070324121045.396218000@metis.extern.pengutronix.de> <460B2B35.4090108@us.ibm.com> <20070329073452.GE32369@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart To: Robert Schwebel Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:41564 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030660AbXC2UIi (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:08:38 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2TK8bna005900 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:08:37 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l2TK8b4o201292 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:08:37 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2TK8aBr027870 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:08:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20070329073452.GE32369@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org Robert Schwebel wrote: >> What we'd like to do, however, is integrate these tests into the LTP >> project. I'm hoping people will still find it as convenient to use. >> Anyone foresee any issues with that move? > > However that might end - I think it is important to have cross compiling > support in LTP; last time I looked it was really difficult to achieve, > because you more or less had to care about every single piece of > sourcecode. Yes, we're looking into all those issues now :(. It's probably a bit more than we wanted to chew off at the moment. I agree with wanting to have cross-compiling support, we might keep some interim solution around perhaps. Thanks a lot for your input! We'll discuss with the list in greater detail next week. thanks, Nivedita