From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ths@networkno.de, ralf@linux-mips.org,
vagabon.xyz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:35:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <460CA1AB.1080608@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070330.120106.96687664.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> This is not Franck's fault. His patchset does not change behavior if
> kernel load address was CKSEG0 and CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 was not set
> (unless you are using gcc 3.x).
I wasn't implying it was anyone's fault of any kind. I actually didn't see your
last response cause Thunderbird got stupid and stopped checking for new mail for
some odd reason.
> Let's clarify things a bit: The Franck's patchset is _not_ fix. It
> just tried to avoid undesirable configuration (CKSEG0 kernel with
> BUILD_ELF64=y), and clarify some namings.
As far as I can tell, the majority of what CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 did got neutered
in 2.6.17. It's pretty much down to those minor #ifdef checks and a few
references on the defconfigs. Removing it entirely is probably the best idea,
and if Frank's patch is one way of doing it, I'm game. Besides, he's got that
loadaddr detector thrown in so we don't have to check on a machine-by-machine
basis if they're loading in CKSEG0 or not.
> So I should ask you again, does current git (or 2.6.20-stable) kernel
> compiled by binutils-2.17/gcc-4.[12] work for IP32 if you disabled
> CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64?
[snip]
> So I had thought CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=n worked for IP32...
If memory serves, yes, it'll boot, because it's close to the old way I that I
used to use when building them. Prior to 2.6.17, I did CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=n
with -mabi=o64. This let me use the plain 'vmlinux' target without any special
changes. 2.6.17 is when I stopped using gcc-3.x for kernels, moved to 4.x, and
started using CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=y w/ -msym32 and friends. Thus I now use
vmlinux.32. I was told that that was the RightWay(TM) to do it.
Hence, the real point of this long chain is mainly to accomplish two things:
1) Finally determine the OneTrueWay(TM) to build 64bit kernels for our three
main CKSEG0-based systems (ip22, ip32, cobalt), and get that way documented so
as to avoid confusion in the future.
2) Get a solution into the tree that does #1, and does it well. So far, Frank's
patch seems like the leading contender here.
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-04 23:18 Building 64 bit kernel on Cobalt Jim Gifford
2007-03-04 23:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-03-08 6:11 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-08 8:46 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-08 12:48 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-08 16:11 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-13 0:57 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-13 10:38 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-13 11:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-03-18 21:52 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-19 1:12 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-19 5:20 ` Jim Gifford
2007-03-19 6:07 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-19 10:08 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-19 10:17 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-21 17:07 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-21 19:31 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-23 13:47 ` Kumba
2007-03-23 15:24 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-24 3:31 ` Kumba
2007-03-24 14:47 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-24 23:16 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-25 7:25 ` [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely Kumba
2007-03-25 14:45 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-26 11:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-03-26 11:56 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-03-26 12:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-03-26 12:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-03-25 16:10 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-25 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-03-26 9:14 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-26 9:42 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-25 16:59 ` Kumba
2007-03-25 17:07 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-25 18:33 ` Kumba
2007-03-26 10:36 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-26 13:48 ` Kumba
2007-03-26 14:43 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-27 0:51 ` Kumba
2007-03-27 14:53 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-27 17:54 ` Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
2007-03-28 15:14 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-27 19:01 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-28 13:26 ` Kumba
2007-03-28 15:24 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-29 1:50 ` Kumba
2007-03-29 14:53 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-30 6:18 ` Kumba
2007-03-30 2:20 ` Kumba
2007-02-18 20:00 ` IP32 prom crashes due to __pa() funkiness Kumba
2007-03-01 4:33 ` Kumba
2007-03-01 9:39 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-10 9:41 ` [PATCH], " peter fuerst
2007-03-17 19:52 ` Kumba
2007-03-17 21:48 ` Arnaud Giersch
2007-03-18 2:04 ` Kumba
2007-03-19 13:53 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-19 14:07 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-19 14:19 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-19 14:17 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-19 14:24 ` Kumba
2007-03-19 14:45 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-19 14:46 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-19 21:35 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-20 14:10 ` Kumba
2007-03-23 15:12 ` Franck Bui-Huu
[not found] ` <45FC3923.2080207@gentoo.org>
2007-03-18 9:42 ` peter fuerst
2007-03-18 21:26 ` Kumba
2007-03-18 21:37 ` Kumba
2007-03-18 22:44 ` Kumba
2007-03-19 13:57 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-30 3:01 ` [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-30 5:35 ` Kumba [this message]
2007-03-30 6:09 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-09-26 2:08 ` CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 broken on IP32 since 2.6.20 Atsushi Nemoto
2007-09-26 5:59 ` Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-26 6:19 ` Giuseppe Sacco
2007-09-27 0:24 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-09-26 9:14 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-09-26 14:42 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely Ralf Baechle
2007-03-26 13:25 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-26 13:54 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-26 14:48 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-26 15:31 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-26 15:45 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-26 16:07 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-27 3:12 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-03-27 8:01 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-26 15:56 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-03-26 9:02 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-03-25 15:40 ` Building 64 bit kernel on Cobalt Atsushi Nemoto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-25 18:13 CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 broken on IP32 since 2.6.20 Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-25 18:32 ` sknauert
2007-09-25 18:43 ` Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-25 18:56 ` sknauert
2007-09-26 8:03 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-09-26 9:14 ` Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-26 9:54 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-09-26 10:24 ` Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-26 11:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-26 13:34 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-09-26 13:46 ` Martin Michlmayr
2007-09-26 14:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-26 15:34 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-09-26 15:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-27 8:11 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-09-27 11:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-27 13:36 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-09-27 13:47 ` Franck Bui-Huu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=460CA1AB.1080608@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ths@networkno.de \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.