From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.60.202.195] (helo=mail.kernelconcepts.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HYKeB-0006Pa-Ag for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:24:27 +0200 Received: from [212.60.202.194] (helo=[192.168.2.131]) by mail.kernelconcepts.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1HYKvu-0000ok-0y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:42:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4610E7D7.8060005@kernelconcepts.de> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:24:07 +0200 From: Florian Boor User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4610C901.2010306@openhardware.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Subject: Re: patch: shasum vs. sha256sum X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:24:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Holger Freyther schrieb: > Philipp changed this line from shasum to sha256sum as he/we thought > sha256sum is more commonly available. If that is not the case I would > propose to disapprove the change as it is more easy to get the > required binary from cpan than to recompile coreutils-native. > As a last resort we could add sha256sum code to base.bbclass... sounds like a good idea, I just ran into the same problem with Ubuntu. Greetings Florian -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: +49 271-771091-15 and the reality of tomorrow. Fax: +49 271-771091-19 [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de 1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588 D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76