From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933264AbXDBQJR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:09:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933215AbXDBQJR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:09:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46555 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933264AbXDBQJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:09:16 -0400 Message-ID: <46112AAA.9050207@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:09:14 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashish Singhai CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI: iomem bigger than 4GB References: <20070401155132.34029.qmail@web51601.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070401155132.34029.qmail@web51601.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ashish Singhai wrote: > Hello, > > Please refer to Andrew' post on this thread on PCI > subsystem assigning prefetchable memory bigger than > 4GB: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/24/160 > > This patch is not included in 2.6.20.1 or earlier -- > it would be helpful if we could have this patch > considered. I have tried it in a simulated environment > and it works. What bug does it fix?