Hi Jose,

My spontaneous reaction would be; really?

My code is based on the socket-abstraction in BlueZ and it works fine for multiple ACL connections, and the SCO-option is only a second socket-invocation on top of that...? Confusing... There has to be some way to solve this? Setting SCO packet type to HV1 allows for three simultaneous SCO connections AFAIK - so this should not be limited in BlueZ - and if it really is, then why and how do I work around that.... I mean, RF_COMM / ACL sockets work just fine...

Regards,
Markus Adolfsson

Jose Vasconcellos skrev:

What you are seeing is normal. The current code only supports one 
connection.
It would be better if the existing code simply would fail to open a second
connection to avoid a lot of confusion.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel

Markus Adolfsson
M.Sc.CE. Product Development
Mail:	markus.adolfsson@free2move.net
Phone:	+46 35 152268
Mobile:	+46 707 165296

Free2move AB -- WIRELESS MADE EASY
Phone:	+46 35 152260
Fax:	+46 35 152269
Web:	www.free2move.net
Address:	Sperlingsgatan 7 SE-30248 Halmstad Sweden