From: Shriramana Sharma <jamadagni@gmail.com>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: efficiency in passing a value to a function
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:43:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4613DCB8.8030007@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello.
Is providing an input to a function by constant reference more efficient
than passing it by value? In what way.
For ex:
int addOne ( const & int inValue ) { return inValue + 1 ; }
vs:
int addOne ( int inValue ) { return inValue + 1 ; }
or:
void printThis ( const & int inValue ) { cout << inValue ; }
vs:
void printThis ( int inValue ) { cout << inValue ; }
I think passing as const & would be more efficient since passing by
value would involve copying the value whereas passing by const & would
skip this step. Am I right? Or is there something else?
Thanks in advance.
Shriramana Sharma.
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 17:13 Shriramana Sharma [this message]
2007-04-04 18:27 ` efficiency in passing a value to a function Glynn Clements
2007-04-11 21:44 ` Adam Dyga
2007-04-04 18:38 ` Steve Graegert
2007-04-05 12:05 ` Glynn Clements
2007-04-05 13:02 ` Steve Graegert
2007-04-08 15:17 ` Shriramana Sharma
2007-04-13 17:23 ` Glynn Clements
2007-04-14 13:15 ` Adam Dyga
2007-04-08 14:45 ` Shriramana Sharma
2007-04-13 17:51 ` Glynn Clements
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4613DCB8.8030007@gmail.com \
--to=jamadagni@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.