From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] asb_100 sensor location in /sys heirarchy changes
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:19:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4615F494.6070403@hhs.nl> (raw)
jk wrote:
> I have a p4pe board with the asb_100 sensor running under linux 2.6.20.
>
> I now notice that the sensors location varies between
> /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/asb100/0-002d and /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/asb100/2-002d
> between reboots.
>
> This creates problems for me since I use sensord and a crontab entry to read the
> sensors but now the location of the sensors in /sys varies with each boot.
>
> Is this a bug?
> If not is there a way to fix the location of the sensor directory in the /sys
> heirarch? (Otherwise, I will need to write some klugey shell script to try to
> find the location at boot-up and then automatically change the crontab entry
> accordingly.
>
> Thanks!
>
Interesting, I've been thinking about this for while, as I foresee problems
here in relation to the DMI based motherboard config project we are working on too.
I think that the currently used scheme where busses are purely numbered instead
of named needs fixing.
Here is what I have on my system:
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0050
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0051
And here is what I would like to have:
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/viapro-0-0050
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/viapro-0-0051
The idea here is that the 0 added here is in case one can have multiple
instances of the same i2c master driver
So if I would also have an i2c driver for my ati radeon, then it would look like:
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/viapro-0-0050
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/viapro-0-0051
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/radeon-0-00xx
This way the order in which the drivers get loaded doesn't matter. We do
ofcourse need to provide compat symlinks with the old names which will still be
driver loading order dependend.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-06 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-06 7:19 Hans de Goede [this message]
2007-04-06 15:52 ` [lm-sensors] asb_100 sensor location in /sys heirarchy changes jk
2007-04-06 16:21 ` Hans de Goede
2007-04-06 17:21 ` jk
2007-04-06 18:10 ` jk
2007-04-06 18:51 ` Hans de Goede
2007-04-06 18:57 ` Hans de Goede
2007-04-08 17:50 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-08 18:40 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-08 18:42 ` Hans de Goede
2007-04-08 18:49 ` Hans de Goede
2007-04-08 20:17 ` lmsensors
2007-04-09 10:06 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-09 11:01 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-17 9:19 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-17 13:34 ` Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
2007-04-17 19:02 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-17 20:52 ` Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
2007-04-19 18:35 ` Jean Delvare
2007-04-19 18:50 ` Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
2007-04-23 5:38 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4615F494.6070403@hhs.nl \
--to=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.