From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martijn Lievaart Subject: Re: packets to local addresses Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:12:07 +0200 Message-ID: <46167157.3080409@rtij.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: MKS Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org MKS wrote: > Hello list > > I have a scenario the a computer has 2 PPP connections, where the > computer is the ppp client. > > $ifconfig > > ppp0 inet 10.0.0.1 p-t-p 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 > > ppp1 inet 10.0.1.1 p-t-p 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 > > for testing purpuses I want packets from ppp0 to ppp1 to actually go > over the physical connection > > e.g. > > ping 10.0.0.1 -I ppp1 should send the packet over the ppp1 (and out > underlyging physical interface eth0) and it should arrive on the ppp0 > interface. (routing is taken care of at the ppp server) The -I flag only changes the source address of the packets, not the routing. And as the packet is destined for the machine itself, it goes over the loopback interface. Maybe adding the -r flag does what you want, but I doubt it. Hping2 probably can do this: -I --interface interface name By default on linux and BSD systems hping2 uses default routing interface. In other systems or when there is no default route hping2 uses the first non-loopback interface. However you are able to force hping2 to use the interface you need using this option. Note: you don't need to specify the whole name, for example -I et will match eth0 ethernet0 myet1 et cetera. If no interfaces match hping2 will try to use lo. HTH, M4