From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martijn Lievaart Subject: Re: packets to local addresses Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 23:39:57 +0200 Message-ID: <46180FAD.50209@rtij.nl> References: <46167157.3080409@rtij.nl> <4617BC88.102@rtij.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, MKS Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Apr 7 2007 17:45, Martijn Lievaart wrote: > >> MKS wrote: >> >>> What is the best way to change this behaviour, that is force "general" >>> packets out a specific interface. iptables route target??? >>> >> Dunno. Maybe the ROUTE target can be of assistence. As I said earlier, hping2 >> probably can do this. >> > > Use MARK and iproute2. > Are you sure? I thought you couldn't overrule the local table. M4