From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tgh <tianguanhua@ncic.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: question about the meaning of memory	auto-translate
	and paravirtual and no pseudophysical overlay
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:59:16 +0800
Message-ID: <461A38A4.80208@ncic.ac.cn>
References: <991B62EB36934C4EBD5B605518A724764C421E@pdsmsx404.ccr.corp.intel.com>	
	<4611C2F7.9060800@ncic.ac.cn> <46145C9C.7060009@ncic.ac.cn>
	<1175962992.12465.11.camel@trevor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1175962992.12465.11.camel@trevor>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Thank you for your reply

Mark Williamson =D0=B4=B5=C0:
> This would be a guest that didn't use the abstraction of pseudophysical
> addresses at all; it would just use virtual and (real) machine
> addresses.  I'm not sure if there are any guests that operate in this
> way...  Certainly the major heavyweight OSes all use this technique whe=
n
> paravirtualised.
>
>  =20
what is the major heavyweight OSes? and how does it paravirtualise?
if there is no pseudophysical addresses,a physical host computer could
only paravirtualise one VM,is it right?



Thank you in advance

>
>  =20