From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <461BC626.3070403@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:15:18 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <305035a40704100947n5d426f9ahf8608957a2264f2f@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <305035a40704100947n5d426f9ahf8608957a2264f2f@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] AT91SAM9261 adeos support for 2.6.19 kernel List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: BOUIN Alexandre , adeos-main@gna.org Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hello, > > We port the adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-arm-1.6-05.patch for AT91SAM9261. > > This patch must be applied on vanilla 2.6.19 with at91 patch ( > http://maxim.org.za/AT91RM9200/2.6/2.6.19-at91.patch.gz ) applied for > supporting AT91SAM9261. > So first get vanilla kernel, then apply at91 patch then apply our > patch instead of adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-arm-1.6-05.patch. > > For now it works with Xenomai on AT91SAM9261-EK, if someone is > intersting we can send the benchmark result. > As AT91SAM926x are pretty similar of AT91RM9200, there is a some > duplicate code and some common code. > In the future it could be also work on all AT91SAM926x, we can test > it. But before going ahead we would like some comment on this patch. > > The better would be working on 2.6.20 which already have support for > AT91SAM926x, but we didn't see any arm patch on this kernel nor any > file modified on git. > > Hope this patch will be usefull. It looks good. I will try and port the I-pipe patch for ARM to Linux 2.6.20. In the meantime, could you separate the AT91SAM9261 specific code and the changes (if any) made to the rest of the I-pipe from the rest of the I-pipe ? This would ease distribution and maintenance. > PS: Would we post it on xenomai list also? Yes, maybe some people there would like to know about this patch. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix