From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Alan D. Brunelle" <alan.brunelle@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:18:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [BTT PATCH] Add back in combined seek output file
Message-Id: <461BC6EE.2060107@hp.com>
List-Id: <linux-btrace.vger.kernel.org>
References: <461BC38D.5040405@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <461BC38D.5040405@hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org

Ming Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:04 -0400, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
>   
>> @@ -149,9 +150,12 @@ void seeki_add(void *handle, struct io *iop)
>>         struct seeki *sip = handle;
>>         long long dist = seek_dist(sip, iop);
>>         FILE *fp = IOP_READ(iop) ? sip->rfp : sip->wfp;
>> +       double tstamp = BIT_TIME(iop->t.time);
>>  
>>         if (fp)
>> -               fprintf(fp, "%15.9lf %13lld\n", BIT_TIME(iop->t.time),
>> dist);
>> +               fprintf(fp, "%15.9lf %13lld\n", tstamp, dist);
>> +       if (sip->cfp)
>> +               fprintf(sip->cfp, "%15.9lf %13lld\n", tstamp, dist);
>>   
>>     
>
> thx for adding this. it might be better if in combined file, print out
> current io is read or write. 
>
> Ming
>
>   
I could do this - very easily - but then the question is the format:

- ASCII ("read" "write")
- Binary (0 = write, 1 = read (or vice versa))

It doesn't matter much to me...

Alan