From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ky Srinivasan" Subject: RE: 32 bit HVM guests Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:43:54 -0600 Message-ID: <461DFD46.E57C.0030.0@novell.com> References: <461DF74C.E57C.0030.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xin B Li , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:32 AM, in message , = "Li, Xin B" wrote:=20 >> ----- Original Message----- >>From: xen- devel- bounces@lists.xensource.com=20 >>[mailto:xen- devel- bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Ky=20 >>Srinivasan >>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:18 PM >>To: xen- devel@lists.xensource.com >>Subject: [Xen- devel] 32 bit HVM guests >> >>When we host 32 bit hvm guests on a 64 bit hypervisor, do we=20 >>currently support loading 32 bit PV drivers in the HVM guest? >> >=20 > Yes! > - Xin=20 Great! Should the PV drivers be built differently since the width of the = physical address in the hypervisor and dom0 is different from what the hvm = guest is compiled for? I trying to test this combination and I have hang = in the xenbus driver. K. Y