All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: add deprecation notice about limit on defer queue element size
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 16:17:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4620749.daG60p0z9X@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1747957021-2581-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>

23/05/2025 01:37, Andre Muezerie:
> The functions rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_create and rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim establish
> no limit on the size of each element in the defer queue.

Very good, we need more unlimited API in DPDK.

> With DPDK 25.11 a hard limit will be set (``RTE_QSBR_ESIZE_MAX``).

I think it is a step in the wrong direction.
I prefer having no limit.

> This will allow fixed C arrays to be used in the functions' implementations,
> avoiding VLAs and use of alloca().

I don't understand this justification.
Why trying to remove the 2 alloca() in the lib RCU?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-01 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-22 23:37 [PATCH] rcu: add deprecation notice about limit on defer queue element size Andre Muezerie
2025-07-01  7:56 ` David Marchand
2025-07-01 14:17 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2025-07-10 14:37   ` Andre Muezerie
2025-07-11 12:38     ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-07-14  9:01       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-07-21 17:47         ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-08-07 19:56         ` Wathsala Vithanage
2025-08-18 13:17           ` Konstantin Ananyev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4620749.daG60p0z9X@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.