From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ronald Subject: Re: Unable to block ICMP Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <46225C81.6070503@gmail.com> References: <46224132.4080702@gmail.com> <78a2adce0704150816o77d64848x5982caafd70c30df@mail.gmail.com> <46224EFE.6060409@gmail.com> <78a2adce0704150914y4e9fd552m8e316ebd1b00ae79@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MeBaV3n8mFL3IT81eXxC7CCuqC+WEZYkgxJ3TLBX+hBT5y+VzLrjQQWyvF7b39Ay4Dh0V7RYcikV0Cc4yjRE8qwGtIXqnIYiA25+LR/yJXPOXTjfCLks3nPUJYP3QVHaWF1uIFURqTQryriobo64uUaltWoNiY+AgzAt9ne5jdM= In-Reply-To: <78a2adce0704150914y4e9fd552m8e316ebd1b00ae79@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Thomas d'Otreppe Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Thomas d'Otreppe schreef: > Ronald, > > the subject of your mail is "Unable to block ICMP", so I just told you > how to block the ICMP (by looking at the rules you posted on the link > you gave). > > Best regards, > > Thomas > > PS: Please use "answer to All", so that everybody get the answer and > can follow this thread > > 2007/4/15, Ronald : >> Thomas d'Otreppe schreef: >> > Ronald, >> > >> > use "iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -j DROP" instead of "iptables -A OUTPUT >> > -p icmp -j DROP" >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Thomas >> > >> > 2007/4/15, Ronald : >> >> Check this thread (posted by me): >> >> >> >> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=152539 >> >> >> >> Could anyone help me here with the problem please ? >> >> >> >> >> >> Ronald >> >> >> >> >> > >> That didn't work either. pcflank.com still sees the ports as closed. Any >> more sugeestions? >> > Well, what I actually wanted (which I probably explained wrong) is that my ports that are not in use (closed) are being invisible (no ICMP echo). That better?