From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Blunck <j.blunck@tu-harburg.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/15] VFS based Union Mount
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:35:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4624DB46.6040400@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070417131459.GA4001@in.ibm.com>
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is an attempt towards vfs based union mount implementation.
> Union mount provides the filesytem namespace unification feature.
> Unlike the traditional mounts which hide the contents of the mount point,
> the union mount presents the merged view of the mount point and the
> mounted filesytem.
does this approach allow one to add directories to the union and have it
behave normally. namely when imagine one has the situation
dir-b
dir-a/ (contains file foo)
if one unions this and deletes foo, that will create a whiteout entry in
dir-a
now, what happens if one does
dir-c
dir-b (now contains whiteout, from previous union).
dir-a (contains file foo)
will one see foo or not. i.e. are whiteouts only looked for in the
topmost dir, or in every dir?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 13:14 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] VFS based Union Mount Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/15] Add union mount documentation Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/15] Add a new mount flag (MNT_UNION) for union mount Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/15] Add the whiteout file type Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:18 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/15] Add config options for union mount Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/15] Introduce union stack Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 22:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-18 3:27 ` Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/15] Union-mount dentry reference counting Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/15] Union-mount mounting Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/15] Union-mount lookup Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/15] Simple union-mount readdir Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/15] In-kernel file copy between union mounted filesystems Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/15] VFS whiteout handling Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/15] ext2 whiteout support Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/15] ext3 " Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/15] tmpfs " Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 13:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/15] Union-mount changes for NFS Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 14:35 ` Shaya Potter [this message]
2007-04-17 16:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/15] VFS based Union Mount Bharata B Rao
2007-04-17 16:56 ` Shaya Potter
2007-04-18 7:19 ` Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4624DB46.6040400@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=spotter@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=j.blunck@tu-harburg.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.