From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: netfilter modul ipt_recent hickup with suspend to ram Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:02:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4624E196.7060004@trash.net> References: <200704161846.05908.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Toralf_F=F6rster?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704161846.05908.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Toralf F=F6rster wrote: > I'm wondering why after a "suspend to ram" or a "suspend to disk" the a= mount of > ip adresses increases drastically w/o removing old addresses. Probably some software running at wakeup. > I'll attach the content of /proc/net/ipt_recent/UDP got at 17:35 (file = 1) and at > 18:37 (file 2), I suspended to ram at 17:36 at waked up the system at 1= 7:49, after > wakeup I restarted the ppp0 interface and got a new ip address. So you made a new internet connection and waited for another 48 minutes? That is a really bad test, who knows what happend in between. Try: cat /proc/net/..., suspend, wakeup, cat /proc/net/... again, without doing anything else in between.