From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4625E977.9040201@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:48:39 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <403B28AE6257B548B66BB88414AC78330174BBD6@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <403B28AE6257B548B66BB88414AC78330174BBD6@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] AT91SAM9261 adeos support for 2.6.19 kernel List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: BOUIN Alexandre Cc: adeos-main@gna.org BOUIN Alexandre wrote: > Nouveaux r=E9sultats, nouvelle =E9bauche de mail : > " > 11 hours later ... here are our results on AT91SAM9261-EK board, and ou= r Adeos patch. >=20 > [run test] > uclibc login: root > # cd /usr/xenomai/bin/ > # ./latency -p 500 -h > [results] > HSH|--param|--samples-|--average--|---stddev-- > HSS| min| 38253| 17.897| 1.879 > HSS| avg| 76507896| 39.422| 16.059 > HSS| max| 38253| 65.688| 6.736 > ---|------------|------------|------------|--------|-------------------= ------ > RTS| 9.023| 39.798| 94.420| 0| 10:37:32/10:37:= 32 >=20 > There was no load while performing these tests. So Gilles, if you had m= ade some softs to make some load, we'll be glad to know them. Please read the TROUBLESHOOTING file. --=20 Gilles Chanteperdrix