From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <j.borkhuis@dutchspace.nl>
Message-ID: <46285CF6.30409@dutchspace.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:25:58 +0200
From: Johan Borkhuis <j.borkhuis@dutchspace.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT patch on 85xx
References: <46275C7A.4030903@dutchspace.nl>
	<1176985606.3877.12.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1176985606.3877.12.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Josh,

Josh Boyer wrote:
> arch/ppc is dying a slow death and is being replaced by arch/powerpc.
> This is likely why there is no ppc "backport".
>   
Thanks for your answer. I was not aware that the ppc-branch was being 
replaced. For the board we use we just received a BSP that is based on 
the ppc-branch.

Is there some documentation available on the differences between the ppc 
and powerpc architecure, and on porting a bsp from ppc to powerpc?

Kind regards,
    Johan Borkhuis