From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kiran Murari Subject: Re: NAT Issue Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:39:21 +0530 Message-ID: <4628AD71.7060101@embeddedinfotech.com> References: <46289F30.9030800@embeddedinfotech.com> <200704201125.l3KBPGSw018412@toshiba.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704201125.l3KBPGSw018412@toshiba.co.jp> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > From: Kiran Murari > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:38:32 +0530 > > >> After little bit of experimenting, I could see that if I flush all the conntrack entries, >> as soon as my WAN is enabled, the PING session continued. >> >> But flushing all the conntrack entries, doesn't look like a feasible one. >> >> Is there a way to flush the conntrack entries that have been created during a specific interval. >> >> Any thoughts. >> > > Why don't you flush table with tool 'conntrack' just after bringing up your > WAN ? > > http://www.netfilter.org/projects/conntrack/index.html > > -- Yasuyuki Kozakai > Yeah I have seen the 'conntrack'. But this requires linnetfilter_conntrack and libnfnetlink support. I am running a 2.6.14 on an Xscale processor. So is there a means to flush the entries, other than porting the 'conntrack' to Xscale. - Kiran