From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754538AbXDUNe4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:34:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754542AbXDUNe4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:34:56 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:57215 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754538AbXDUNez (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:34:55 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: PVE5OD0GJTq3tQpli/sheVrnwZZICSRkbuKU8BLBYCMB 1177162494 Message-ID: <462A139A.30805@imap.cc> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:37:30 +0200 From: Tilman Schmidt Organization: me - organized?? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de, Andrew Morton , Karsten Keil Subject: Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff References: <462A03D7.4030508@imap.cc> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig917A4E5720CAA7B31BEB4DE2" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig917A4E5720CAA7B31BEB4DE2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 21.04.2007 15:11 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: [...] >> Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression. >=20 > i know. believe me, i *know that*, since i'm fairly sure it was my > observation that initially started that discussion about isdn4linux. Sure. I didn't want to suggest otherwise. Sorry if I did. > i did make it clear in that previous post that all i was doing was > listing stuff in the source tree that is currently marked with > "obsolete" or something like that, with no regard to any discussion > that's taken place about it recently. Of course, and thanks for that. But I can't just let it stand uncommented, can I? People might start believing isdn4linux *was* obsolete because "it was on that list of obsolete items, and nobody protested." > all i was interested in was feedback along the lines of, "oh, yeah, > *that* feature is thoroughly dead and can be tossed," nothing more. Right. So please don't feel annoyed by my reply. Just take it as a feedback of "*that* feature definitely isn't dead". Thanks Tilman --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany --------------enig917A4E5720CAA7B31BEB4DE2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGKhOaMdB4Whm86/kRAqdgAJ9F8ppK+YLsVGLna5ycI0HF3iWU9ACePF5O YZ9cjfU33KCkP65q9puhVzo= =mhpq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig917A4E5720CAA7B31BEB4DE2--