From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (unknown [85.21.88.2]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB1C4DDF51 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:53:30 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <462E0CF5.4060402@ru.mvista.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:58:13 +0400 From: Andrei Konovalov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Using Xilinx Framebuffer on ML405 and 2.6.20.4 References: <462DCA31.4060009@computing.dundee.ac.uk> <528646bc0704240638m4c9dd04dlaaef0e8cdb57af53@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <528646bc0704240638m4c9dd04dlaaef0e8cdb57af53@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > On 4/24/07, Peter Mendham wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I am wanting to use the Xilinx TFT controller from the ML403/5 reference >> project (probably from ML300 as well) under a 2.6.20.4 kernel. I have >> Grant Likely's patchset applied in which there is a platform device >> entry for the framebuffer. Does anyone know if there is mainline >> support for the Xilinx-style framebuffer? If so, how do I enable it? I >> have included framebuffer support in my kernel build, but I assume I >> need a driver also? Any tips greatly appreciated. > > Heh, I've got a driver. I just haven't published it yet. Give me a few days... > > g. > We have one too :)