From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a <jfs@computer.org>,
Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@Oracle.com>,
anibal@debian.org
Subject: Re: Portmap - was Re: Does mountd/statd really need to listen on a privileged port??
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:04:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <462E38B9.5020808@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070424161027.GA30213@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Although not the fastes approach the only long-term viable one
> would be to update the glibc rpc code for the new TIRPC APIs and
> IPv6 support. Even if it's unclear whether Uli would actually
> include it that gives a better start to avoid all kinds of security
> or useability-related regressions.
Well I have a strong hunch that the glibc people do not want anything
to do with changing *any* of the RPC code. I know for a fact that they
are very sorry the accepted in the first place... so with
that type of motivation I really think it would be very painful
to sell them on take any patches... at all...
Secondly, having the to debug and fix a small part of the
RPC code in glibc, I have experienced how truly difficult
it is work with such a large beast... so I pretty confident
that breaking out the RPC into a library we can maintain
ourselves is a good direction to move...
steved.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-12 22:05 Does mountd/statd really need to listen on a privileged port?? Neil Brown
2007-04-13 0:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-04-16 1:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-13 0:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-13 1:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-13 1:39 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-13 2:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-17 10:14 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 11:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-16 18:13 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-17 10:08 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 11:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-04-17 11:32 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-18 7:14 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-19 0:46 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-19 1:21 ` Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
2007-04-20 3:04 ` Portmap - was " Neil Brown
2007-04-20 6:49 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-20 8:02 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-20 13:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-20 19:18 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-23 4:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-23 6:31 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-23 13:43 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-24 0:56 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 17:13 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-23 13:28 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-23 23:09 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 6:43 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-24 7:24 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 15:15 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-04-24 15:31 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-04-24 7:08 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-24 15:10 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-24 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-24 17:04 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2007-04-24 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-24 17:52 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-24 19:09 ` Peter Åstrand
2007-04-24 20:26 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-24 20:36 ` Peter Staubach
2007-04-25 11:56 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-25 15:44 ` Peter Staubach
2007-04-25 20:14 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-26 6:32 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-26 8:59 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-26 13:03 ` Peter Staubach
2007-05-02 4:22 ` Ian Kent
2007-04-27 15:07 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-27 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-27 17:07 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-29 23:32 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-26 7:52 ` Aurélien Charbon
2007-04-25 8:57 ` Peter Åstrand
2007-04-25 8:56 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-25 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-25 13:22 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-25 14:10 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-25 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-26 14:30 ` Peter Åstrand
2007-04-25 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-25 13:39 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-26 22:22 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-27 2:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 6:20 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-27 14:01 ` Peter Staubach
2007-04-27 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-27 14:21 ` Peter Staubach
2007-04-27 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-29 23:39 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-27 16:49 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-27 17:06 ` Peter Staubach
2007-04-27 17:04 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-27 17:34 ` Peter Staubach
2007-05-04 18:52 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-24 14:38 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-19 15:15 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-19 15:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-19 15:42 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-19 15:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-19 16:36 ` Steve Dickson
2007-04-19 22:50 ` Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=462E38B9.5020808@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=anibal@debian.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jfs@computer.org \
--cc=mkoenig@novell.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=olaf.kirch@Oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.