From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Padam J Singh <me@padamj.com>
Subject: Re: Async processing using NetFilters
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:39:46 +0530
Message-ID: <46306C5A.2060101@padamj.com>
References: <200704260852.l3Q8qPg0028578@brahma.intotoind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
To: Lokesh <lokeshnb@intoto.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704260852.l3Q8qPg0028578@brahma.intotoind.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Hello Lokesh,

Try the NF_STOLEN approach, and take care of the skb. You can re-inject 
the packet this way.

R,
Padam.

Lokesh wrote:
> Hi All,
>> I'm using Linux RedHat 9  kernel version 2.4.20-8
>> I want to do some asynchronous processing of packets in my kernel 
>> module that is registered as
>> Netfilter Hook. I tried to make use of NF_QUEUE but found that only 
>> one call back function per
>> protocol family (PF) is provided and already some module (probably 
>> NET_LINK socket interface)
>> is making use of it for PF_INET.  Is there any way to use NF_QUEUE 
>> facility without disturbing
>> NET_LINK ? why per hook registration of call back function of 
>> NF_QUEUE is not provided?
>> How to proceed if someone had to do async processing of packets so 
>> that pkts can be queued to crypto hardware processing unit and can be 
>> safely reinjected back into kernel later so that other registered 
>> hooks can get pkts?
>> any help is highly appreciated.
>> Thanks
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************** 
>
> This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of 
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary 
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure 
> or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all 
> copies of the original message. Thank you.
>
> Intoto Inc.
>
>