From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: PUCCETTI Armand Subject: Re: incompatible prototypes Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:51:24 +0200 Message-ID: <46321BFC.9090804@cea.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser a =E9crit : > > On 27/4/07 09:23, "PUCCETTI Armand" wrote: > > =20 >> Also, it seems that in the declaration part (file vmx.c:1966) of the >> following fct, some >> extern are missing, and that the functions smp_event_check_interrupt a= nd >> smp_call_function_interrupt >> are also incompatible with their body (in file smp.c:326 and smp.c:332= ) >> =20 > > Extern is optional on function prototypes. Asmlinkage defines away to > nothing. So there's a lack of consistency, but nothing incorrect. > > -- Keir > > > > =20 You're quite right on the first point. However the incompatible prototype= s might lead to errors if some of these functions are called. Armand