From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031188AbXD1T2J (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:28:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031201AbXD1T2J (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:28:09 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:49334 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031188AbXD1T2F (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:28:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4633A0A9.7090105@tmr.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:29:45 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel To: Martin Steigerwald CC: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? References: <200704271044.13916.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <200704271044.13916.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi Con and Ingo! > > What would be the best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? I used > 1000HZ for a long time, but use 300HZ since 2.6.20. This worked well > enough for sd-0.46 and previous versions and ck patches... > That's a good point, all the tests I've done are at 1000, that's just my default and I didn't bother to change it. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot