All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"ddutile@redhat.com" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	"berrange@redhat.com" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"nathanc@nvidia.com" <nathanc@nvidia.com>,
	"mochs@nvidia.com" <mochs@nvidia.com>,
	"smostafa@google.com" <smostafa@google.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	"zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/6] hw/arm/smmuv3: Check SMMUv3 has PCIe Root Complex association
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:15:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463538bc608e4d04940e2122ca5e393f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb2a688d-fbf2-497e-8baf-f28352766105@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:02 AM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; jgg@nvidia.com; nicolinc@nvidia.com;
> ddutile@redhat.com; berrange@redhat.com; nathanc@nvidia.com;
> mochs@nvidia.com; smostafa@google.com; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@huawei.com>; Wangzhou (B) <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>;
> jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] hw/arm/smmuv3: Check SMMUv3 has PCIe Root
> Complex association
> 
> > shouldn't you check as well that !pci_bus_bypass_iommu(bus)?
> 
> I see you do the check in 6/6 and I think this is the correct way because in
> case of legacy SMMU it is allowed to have pci_bus_bypass_iommu set on
> the root bus to let the SMMU apply only on pxb buses only. So please
> ignore this comment.

Yes. It is to keep the existing behavior for legacy SMMUv3.

Thanks,
Shameer

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-05 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-02 15:41 [PATCH v3 0/6] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user creatable SMMUv3 device Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] hw/arm/smmuv3: Check SMMUv3 has PCIe Root Complex association Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-05  9:13   ` Eric Auger
2025-06-05  9:53   ` Eric Auger
2025-06-05 10:02     ` Eric Auger via
2025-06-05 10:02       ` Eric Auger via
2025-06-05 11:15       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via [this message]
2025-06-05 10:55   ` Igor Mammedov
2025-06-05 11:29     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 11:29       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 12:19       ` Igor Mammedov
2025-06-05 12:36         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 12:36           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 13:05           ` Igor Mammedov
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Re-arrange SMMUv3 IORT build Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-05  9:39   ` Eric Auger
2025-06-05 11:10     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 11:10       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Update IORT for multiple smmuv3 devices Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-05  9:57   ` Eric Auger
2025-06-05 11:14     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-05 11:14       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] hw/arm/virt: Factor out common SMMUV3 dt bindings code Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] hw/arm/virt: Add an SMMU_IO_LEN macro Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] hw/arm/virt: Allow user-creatable SMMUv3 dev instantiation Shameer Kolothum via
2025-06-05 12:45   ` Eric Auger
2025-06-05  2:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user creatable SMMUv3 device Nathan Chen
2025-06-05  2:34   ` Donald Dutile
2025-06-05 17:58     ` Nathan Chen
2025-06-05 20:58       ` Donald Dutile

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463538bc608e4d04940e2122ca5e393f@huawei.com \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nathanc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.