From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@zoy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:34:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46375E04.5030506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070501130715.GB29131@zoy.org>
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> I'm having an issue with lost ticks, runnign linux 2.6.20.10 on an
> intel DQ965GF motherboard. For some reason this occurs with clock-like
> regularity, always exactly 24 lost ticks, about every two seconds.
> This is running with 250-HZ ticks, and the small pause every two seconds
> is also noticeable when using the console.
>
>
> running with report_lost_ticks, I see the following:
>
> May 1 12:58:57 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:58:59 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:01 server kernel: time.c: Lost 25 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:03 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:07 server last message repeated 2 times
> May 1 12:59:10 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:12 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:14 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:16 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:18 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:20 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:52 server last message repeated 15 times
> May 1 13:00:51 server last message repeated 28 times
> May 1 13:01:47 server last message repeated 27 times
> May 1 13:01:50 server kernel: time.c: Lost 25 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 13:01:56 server last message repeated 3 times
> May 1 13:01:58 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
>
>
> Since the rip often mentions _spin_unlock_irqrestore, I figured maybe
> someone sleeps for 25 ticks with the interrupts disabled. I tried
> running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP but this did not uncover anything.
>
>
> I also noticed this code in arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c. I'm not sure if it
> has anything to do with my issue, but it might since I get lost_count==24...
> I could not figure out what this code is trying to do though.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> /* In some cases the CPU can change frequency without us noticing
> Give cpufreq a change to catch up. */
> if ((lost_count+1) % 25 == 0)
> cpufreq_delayed_get();
> #endif
>
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here. Additional information about my system:
>
Try disabling CONFIG_CPU_FREQ?
> One last thing: I have another box which is fairly similar, with a
> DG965RY motherboard. That other box does *not* seem to lose any ticks,
> running the same kernel that works so poorly on the DQ965GF board.
> Does that point to a hardware/bios issue then ?????
Is it running the exact same kernel, with the same cpufreq settings at
runtime (governor, controller, etc?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 13:07 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-01 15:34 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2007-05-01 21:49 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-01 22:08 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-01 22:41 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-01 22:45 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-02 0:06 ` Lee Revell
2007-05-02 8:41 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-02 16:07 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-02 18:14 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-03 6:27 ` e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel) Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-03 15:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-03 15:56 ` Allan, Bruce W
2007-05-04 18:25 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-04 21:15 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-02 12:54 ` 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46375E04.5030506@redhat.com \
--to=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walken@zoy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.