All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.21: Kernel won't boot with either/both of	CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 18:29:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463910BF.9050103@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178120457.25504.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Oh crap.  It's back.

I don't know what's different from before,
but the system now locks up again exactly the same way,
even with the lock contention fix applied.

With or without CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y in the config.

I've gotta get some work done here (this is my primary development machine),
so it's back to CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y for a while.

If anyone has a patch to dump out state/whatever just before that
last message that preceeds all lockups, then pass it along and
I'll queue it up for testing as soon as I can.

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-02 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30 20:17 [BUG] 2.6.21: Kernel won't boot with either/both of CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS Mark Lord
2007-04-30 20:19 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-30 20:37   ` Mark Lord
2007-04-30 23:36     ` Mark Lord
2007-04-30 23:45       ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-30 23:46       ` Daniel Walker
2007-05-01  0:02         ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01  0:07           ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-01  0:11             ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01  0:13               ` Daniel Walker
2007-05-01  3:33                 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01  4:32                   ` Daniel Walker
2007-05-01  4:34                   ` Daniel Walker
2007-05-01 13:34           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-01 13:33             ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01 13:34               ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01 13:48                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-01 14:13                   ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01 14:26                     ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-01 14:41                       ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01 15:24                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-01 16:31                       ` Mark Lord
2007-05-01 16:42                         ` Daniel Walker
2007-05-01 15:57                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-01 16:52                       ` Mark Lord
2007-05-02  7:47                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-02  8:05                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-02 12:53                             ` Mark Lord
2007-05-02 15:40                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-02 22:29                               ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-05-02 22:41                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-03  2:29                                   ` Mark Lord
2007-05-08 18:46                                     ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463910BF.9050103@rtr.ca \
    --to=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.