From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [tools-dev] Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:14:37 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <4639FC5D.8F24E45E@eudaptics.com> References: <200705012346.14997.jnareb@gmail.com> <200705021624.25560.kendy@suse.cz> <200705030130.44018.jnareb@gmail.com> <200705031351.40548.kendy@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@openoffice.org To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 03 17:15:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hjd1X-0002rA-F2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:15:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993224AbXECPOs (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 11:14:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993226AbXECPOs (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 11:14:48 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:33506 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993224AbXECPOr (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 11:14:47 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjd12-0000Xa-VF for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:14:44 +0200 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:14:44 +0200 Received: from J.Sixt by cm56-163-160.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:14:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-163-160.liwest.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Last question: what is the status of the Win32 support? I got a full clone > using the Cygwin git 1.5.0 [it took 6hrs 20min on a Xen virtual machine; I > have to try it with real hardware], MinGW version did not work for me too > well :-( I'd really like to hear what you exactly mean by "MinGW version did not work too well". I use it in production. (But then, I'm the one who publishes the MinGW port ;) -- Hannes